Table 7 Results of the Quality Indicator Analysis for Single Case Design
| Author (Year) | Quality Indicator | (%) | Overall Quality |
| Participants, Setting | Dependent Variable/ Measure | Independent Variable/ Intervention | procedures | Design/Graph/Results | Social Validity |
| 1* | 2* | 3* | 4* | 5* | 6* | 7* | 8* | 9* | 10* | 11* | 12* | 13* | 14* | 15* | 16* | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| Howorth et al. (2023a) | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | X | O | X | O | O | X | O | X | X | O | O | 80 | NQ |
| Howorth et al. (2023b) | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | X | O | O | O | O | O | O | X | X | O | O | 85 | NQ |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 83 | NQ |
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 75 | 83 | 50 |
Note. [H] High Quality (Must meet all 20 indicators), [A] (Must meet Indicators 1-16 and at least one of 17-20), [NQ] Did not Meet Quality