Table 8 Distribution of Effect-Level Classifications Based on Criteria for Each Indicator1) 2) (k =111)
| Comparison | Low/No Effect (Level 1) | Medium (Level 2) | High (Level 3) | Very High/Large Effect (Level 4) |
| PND | 6(5.4)3) | 2(1.8) | 8(7.2) | 95(85.6) |
| IRD | 3(2.7) | 1(0.9) | 2(1.8) | 105(94.6) |
| Tau-U | 3(2.7) | 10(9.0)4) | 98(88.3) |
Effect-level classifications for PND, IRD, and Tau-U were determined according to the criteria reported in previous studies for each Indicator
Four-level criteria were applied to PND and IRD, whereas three-level criteria were applied to Tau-U
Unit: n(%)
The Tau-U range of .65–.93 was presented as a medium-to-high effect range, corresponding to Levels 2 and 3